Turbify
Aabaco Small Business, LLC
以 Turbify 名義經營的小企業架站與網站代管服務商,母公司是 Infinite Computer Solutions。
開放型 對象是內容發布者、品牌和創作者,沒寫資格限制
申請書怎麼說
申請書想讓 .advice 成為理財、法律常識、健康、育兒、職涯、居家和旅遊等指南與教學內容的去處,對象是媒體、品牌和獨立創作者,不是專業人士的個人網站。它打算用防濫用政策處理冒稱持有專業執照和灌水內容的註冊,並另外經營 money.advice 這類高價網址。
看英文原文
Mission and purpose. .advice is a generic Top-Level Domain created to give publishers, brands, and content creators a dedicated, recognizable namespace for guidance and how-to content online. Our mission is to become the go-to domain space where trusted advice content spanning personal finance, legal information, health and wellness, parenting, careers, home and lifestyle, travel, and other guidance topics is published and discovered. This establishes an authoritative content destination that is distinct and offers an alternative to .com-style domains.
Intended registrants and users. Our target audience is publishers, brands, and independent creators operating content destinations rather than professional-identity sites. This includes personal finance media and affiliates, legal self-help publishers, health and wellness content sites, parenting and family media, career and education publishers, home/DIY and lifestyle guides, travel content sites, non-regulated coaches and creators, corporate content-marketing teams running expert-advice hubs, and niche and affiliate bloggers. The North American addressable base spans an estimated 2.4M–4.5M sites, brands, and creators across these content verticals. The intended users of these domains are the readers and consumers who visit .advice sites seeking practical guidance on money, health, parenting, legal questions, careers, and everyday decisions.
Related activities — completed. In determining TLD viability we conducted the following:
• Bottom-up market sizing across content verticals (TAM ~2.4M–4.5M sites/brands/creators; SAM ~450,000–750,000 high-intent publishers)
• Competitive and premium-inventory analysis (e.g., money.advice, legal.advice, health.advice)
• Wholesale/retail pricing benchmarking against comparable guidance-content TLDs (.guide, .help, .tips)
• Three-scenario (Most Likely / Worst Case / Best Case) financial model covering registrations, revenue, operating costs, taxes, and cash flow through Year 3
• Collision, contention, and string-similarity risk assessment
• Selection of an RSP evaluation path
Related activities — planned. Post-delegation, we will launch channel partnerships with personal-finance media networks, affiliate publishers, and site-builder/hosting platforms. We will run targeted marketing campaigns aimed at content publishers and brands seeking a guidance-topic domain, and attend and exhibit at digital publishing, content marketing, and affiliate marketing conferences to build direct relationships with prospective registrants. Turbify will also build ongoing relationships with resellers and registrars to secure prioritized display of .advice alongside legacy TLD options, and will operate a premium/category name allocation program. Finally, we will implement an abuse-prevention policy addressing misleading claims of professional licensure and low-quality or spam content registrations.
Over time. .advice registrants build content assets that compound in value; accumulated search rankings, inbound links, and reader trust are costly to rebuild elsewhere, giving publishers a strong incentive to renew rather than migrate. This is reflected in renewal assumptions of 90% for premium, sunrise, and early-access domains and 70–90% for standard domains in year two, held consistent across all planning scenarios. Demand spans many independent, largely uncorrelated content verticals (personal finance, legal, health, parenting, careers, home, and travel) within a ~2.4M–4.5M-entity addressable market, so a slowdown in a topic category has limited effect on the namespace overall. Premium names (e.g., money.advice, legal.advice) add renewal-independent revenue on top of the base registrant pool. Our financial model projects operating profitability (revenue exceeding expenses, before financing) by Year 2 in the Most Likely case and by Year 3 in the Worst Case, supporting long-term viability without dependence on continued applicant subsidy.